The manufacturing line the module was designed for.

Production Overview

Project Vision


To transform the current production schedule feature into a comprehensive module as Production Overview which supports increase in production through efficient monitoring systems, offering real-time insights to optimize operations and maximize productivity.

This started as a calendar redesign. As research surfaced more gaps (no real-time status, numbers with no trend context), the scope grew with them, into the three-part module below.

Role
UX Design Intern, Wipro Linecraft AI
Scope
End-to-end module, research through handoff
Methods
Contextual inquiry, usability testing, heuristic evaluation
Status
Shipped
Timeline
Roughly 4-5 months
Note
Data altered under NDA

Existing Feature Study

Examined the current features to understand their functionality and pinpoint any gaps or opportunities for innovation and monitoring real-time changes and customer requests.

The existing production schedule calendar view it replaced.
The feature as it stood — a calendar, not a monitor

What is the Existing Feature?

  • Primarily functions as a calendar view, providing details on production.
  • Offers production breakdowns by shifts and part type upon hovering
  • Facilitates modification for shifts and targets for a specified duration.

Where Does it Fall Short?

  • Doesn't support real-time monitoring during shifts, lacking insightful shift & day analysis.
  • Absence of upfront data on production breakdown by quality and part type.
  • External referencing for graphs needed for comprehensive insights.
  • Simplistic modification process lacking enriched flow.
  • Inability to visualize and identify patterns within shared data in the existing module, essential for analysis.
  • Absence of data on the reasons behind modifications and the responsible person.
A close view of the schedule's hover breakdown, with shift and part-type figures crammed into a tooltip.
Detail is buried in hover states, not surfaced

What changed

Before, knowing production status meant walking to the board or waiting on a delayed dashboard. Now it's live: supervisors can see a shift's output as it happens and act mid-shift instead of finding out after.

The gap was real, and closing it mattered most in the window where the information could still change the day.

Secondary Research Insights

  • Manufacturing Blogs, Whitepapers and Articles
  • Literature Review
  • Competitive Analysis
  • Manufacturing Documentation
  • Despite potential information overload, users prefer rich interfaces with helpful features for informed decision-making. Enhanced visualization reduces cognitive load and empowers efficient process management. Strong visual cues, immediate accessibility of data, tooltips, context menus, and a flat information hierarchy contribute to a better user experience.
  • Integration of IIoT in manufacturing boosts smarter, more efficient production as real-time tracking and monitoring enhance resource efficiency, reduce costs, and increase competitiveness.
  • Performance evaluation frameworks improve visibility and decision-making at all enterprise levels. Data analytics and machine learning applied to IIoT data optimize processes and enable predictive analytics for operational excellence.
  • A comprehensive strategy is necessary to address scalability, user adaptation, integration barriers, data quality, security, and customization to fully leverage emerging technologies. These support operational capabilities and sustainable development goals, enhancing transparency and customer satisfaction.

Competitive Analysis

Competitors reviewed — direct: MachineMetrics, Plex, Honeywell Forge, Tulip; indirect: Katana, Plataine, SAP, Siemens.
  • Real-time updates and visibility on the production floor are standard features, ensuring responsiveness.
  • Increasing adoption of AI-driven insights and advanced analytics for deeper insights into production & identifying improvement for operational efficiency.
  • Improved user interfaces and role-based control features are becoming standard to ensure systems are tailored to different roles.
  • Seamless integration with ERP systems is a key strength, particularly for SAP products, enabling smooth data flow and comprehensive enterprise management.
  • Incorporating features that help monitor and reduce environmental impact is becoming increasingly important.
  • Most solutions offer advanced production planning and scheduling tools, with features like automated scheduling and resource allocation.

Primary Research

  • Interviews
  • Shadowing
  • Contextual Inquiry
  • Questionnaires
Sample Size
20
Duration
60 Mins

Potential Users and Stakeholders

Potential Users and Primary Stakeholders

  • Production Supervisors
  • Production Manager
  • Production Planner
  • Plant Head

Other Potential Stakeholders

  • Quality Supervisors
  • Quality Manager
  • Maintenance Supervisors
  • Maintenance Manager

Subject Matter Experts

Subject Matter Experts

  • Configuration Team
  • Product & Design Team
  • Marketing Team
  • Engineering Team
  • Sales Team
  • Customer Success Team

Manufacturing Line Visits

Insights on Production Artefacts

On the manufacturing line, documenting how production is tracked today.
Production still recorded by hand at the line
Production artefacts and handwritten records kept at the line.
Shift boards — the real dashboard before this project
Shop-floor boards and andon displays used to communicate status.
Tracking sheets pinned where the work happens

Mapping the Insights

The affinity map clustering research notes into roles, insights, customer inputs and solution directions.
Every research note, clustered — the legend below decodes the colours
Affinity Map Legend:
  • Roles and Responsibilities/Operations
  • Insights
  • Customer Inputs
  • Potential Direction for Solution

Major Insights and Observations

The current data entry methods utilized are manual, with only a few digital outputs rarely monitored throughout the production process.

There is a noticeable delay in identifying the root cause of production issues, followed by further delays in their long term resolution.

Essential data for understanding line performance is fragmented across the shop floor, causing significant time delays in gathering comprehensive insights.

Recurring factors contribute to production issues, sometimes remaining undetected in terms of their full impact, leading to persistent challenges.

Data collected on the shop floor often fails to provide actionable insights, highlighting a lack of guidance in addressing deviations, hindering problem-solving.

There exists a lengthy chain of communication to relay information to higher management, leading to potential delays in addressing critical issues.

and why do production issues arise?

Method

Inefficient sequencing of assets and subpar man-machine coordination lead to inefficiencies and delays in production.

Machine

Equipment breakdowns and operational inefficiencies often disrupt production and result in escalated maintenance costs.

Man

Inadequate training and the burden of overworked labor significantly reduce productivity and increase errors.

Material

Shortages, late deliveries and inconsistent incoming quality stall the line and force rework, driving up scrap and cost.

Delays in Manufacturing Process Flow

The manufacturing process flow annotated with where delays accumulate.
Where delay accumulates across the process flow

Sorting Identified Problems

PriorityProblemsStakeholders
High PriorityScattered tracking of data affecting production, hence unable to identify the production issues in one glanceProduction SupervisorManager / Plant Head
Recurring factors lead to production issues, which can often go undetected in terms of impact.Production SupervisorManager / Plant Head
Lack of attribution for missed targets and reasons for modifying production schedules, shifts, targets, and timings which is crucial to identify recurring issues.Production PlannerProduction SupervisorManager / Plant Head
The data collected on the shop floor does not provide actionable insights, and there is a lack of guidance on addressing deviations or missed targets.Production PlannerProduction SupervisorManager / Plant Head
Medium PrioritySole reliance on manual shop floor data and andon systems for tracking production progress.Production SupervisorManager / Plant Head
Updating all levels and departments with various priority information is time-consuming.Production PlannerProduction SupervisorManager / Plant HeadVPs
Absence of ERP integration for resource allocation.Production Planner
Difficulty in identifying the most efficient way to modify schedules due to unforeseen issuesProduction SupervisorManager / Plant Head
Low PriorityThe production plan lacks clear visibility across all levels, requiring multiple printing and sharing.Production PlannerProduction SupervisorManager / Plant HeadVPs
Tracking operator performance after assigning task is a tedious process.Production Supervisor

Key Problems in Flow

  1. 1. Tedious Manual Data Entry

    Labor-intensive process of inputting data manually, often prone to errors and inefficiencies.

  2. 2. Fragmented Data Collection

    Data scattered across multiple places, affects timely comprehensive analysis for decision-making.

  3. 3. Lack of Actionable Insights

    Data collected fails to provide meaningful or useful information for guiding decisions or addressing issues effectively.

  4. 4. Delayed Root Cause Identification

    Extended process of pinpointing underlying reasons of issues, resulting in prolonged resolution times & operational disruptions.

  5. 5. Recurring Factors Causing Issues

    Identifying persistent elements or circumstances contributing to ongoing problems or challenges in operations.

  6. 6. Lengthy Communication Chain

    Communication process involving multiple steps or intermediaries, resulting in delays and potential misinterpretations.

Refined Problem Statement


Identifying and promptly resolving production issues is time-consuming, primarily due to inefficient processes in gathering and analyzing shop floor data alongside ineffective communication among teams. The fragmented nature of production data limits comprehensive insight generation which is necessary for effective decision-making.

Target User Personas

The Production Supervisor and Manager represent frontline and strategic management. Addressing their needs and frustrations would streamline processes, improve communication, and enhance decision-making, boosting efficiency and productivity in the manufacturing plant.

Production Supervisor

Vikram

Vikram runs the floor shift to shift. The numbers he needs are scattered across shop-floor sheets and andon boards with no single place to check them — and per the prioritised problem table, that gap is his and his manager's alone to absorb. Even once he tracks a number down, nothing tells him what to do about it.

I can see the numbers are down. What I can't see is why, and by the time I've pieced it together, the shift's already over.

Production Manager

Meera

Meera coordinates across departments and reports up to plant leadership. Recurring issues go undetected in their full impact until they've already cost several shifts, and relaying priority information through every level is, on its own, time-consuming enough to eat into the time she needs for actual decisions.

The same issue quietly costs us every week and nobody's connected the dots, and by the time it reaches me, it's already old news.

User Journey

The current-state user journey mapping actions, pain points and opportunities.
The current-state journey, with pain points marked

Design Intervention

Ideal Production Monitoring & Analysis Process

Understanding the optimal flow for production monitoring and analysis process and then breaking it down into specific steps.

The ideal monitoring and analysis flow, broken into five sequential steps: assess KPIs, investigate root causes, reference historical data, address the issues, then adjust schedules.

Design Direction

  • Highlight crucial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and relevant graphs upfront, such as those categorized by part type and machines, to facilitate decision-making.
  • Allow to perform a flow for analysis till asset level data as per the problem solving required.
  • Provide insights with analysis, with subsequent expansion on strategies to address production issues, including recommendations eventually.
  • Enhance the flow of modification information, also detailing when the modifications occurred, what was modified, why they were made, and by whom they were made

Initial Concepts

Wireframe sketch of a gamified monitoring screen with progress bars and a performance table.

Gamification of Production Monitoring

Concept
Design a gamified interface for production monitoring, where employees can track their individual and team performance in real-time.
How it works
The interface employs visual cues, such as progress bars, badges, and leaderboards, to provide instant feedback on production targets and achievements. Additionally, interactive challenges and rewards can be incorporated to incentivize productivity and foster friendly competition among teams.
Benefits
Enhances user engagement and motivation, promotes a sense of accomplishment among employees, and encourages continuous improvement through positive reinforcement.
Wireframe sketch of a timeline with draggable bars representing shifts and tasks.

Drag and Drop Bars for Scheduling

Concept
Transforming production scheduling into an interactive experience akin to adjusting bars in video editing software or block coding.
How it works
Users manipulate bars representing tasks or events by dragging or resizing them, allowing dynamic adjustments to the schedule.
Benefits
Provides a visual representation of the production schedule, simplifies manipulation through familiar interactions, fosters engagement through interactivity, streamlines decision-making by offering real-time adjustments, reduces the learning curve through intuitive controls, and enhances productivity by enabling quick modifications.
Rough sketch of a voice-and-AR interaction, drawn as spoken lines and controls.

Voice-Activated Production Assistance with AR

Concept
Combine AR-based guidance with voice-activated assistants to offer real-time support. AR overlays contextual info on equipment, while voice commands access data, troubleshooting guides.
How it works
Employees can interact with the system using natural language to access production data, retrieve troubleshooting info, or report issues. It provides instant responses and recommendations, enabling faster decision-making and problem resolution.
Benefits
Enhances accessibility and usability for employees, reduces cognitive load and task complexity, improves response times to production issues, and supports hands-free operation.
Wireframe sketch of a customisable dashboard with four KPI dials.

Personalized Production Insights Dashboard

Concept
Design a personalized production insights dashboard that tailors content and visualizations based on individual user roles and preferences.
How it works
Employees can customize their dashboard layout, select relevant KPIs and metrics, and set up alerts for key events or thresholds. The dashboard provides actionable insights and recommendations tailored to each user's specific needs, improving decision-making and productivity.
Benefits
Increases user engagement and adoption of the dashboard, improves relevance and usability of production data, facilitates targeted problem-solving and decision-making.

Focus Groups

Participants
5 Novice and 5 Expert
Duration
20 – 30 mins

Key Insights and Recommendations

  • Incorporate interactive graphs and charts for better understanding of production data along with KPIs. Provide real-time production and operation condition status.
  • Simplify the menu structure for clearer pathways to key features, enhancing navigation and intuitiveness.
  • Enable modifications based on shifts to comprehend the total production or the different part types being manufactured.
  • Include multiple shopfloor edge cases for considering the modification flow.
  • Only knowing the production numbers is not important, the context which led to these low numbers is of greater significance.
  • Allow personalization of dashboards or prioritization of information according to the roles.

Guerrilla Testing

Duration
30 – 40 mins

Key Insights and Recommendations

  • The dashboard data lacks clarity regarding the timeframe it represents, such as whether it pertains to a specific shift, an entire day, or some other period, as no information is provided.
  • The calendar view in schedules is overloaded with information, causing cognitive overload. Accessing the same data through charts in analysis by selecting a date range is more efficient.
  • All the data is there, but it requires considerable time and effort to interpret. Understanding entails a lot of reading and exploration on the screen.
  • Users find it challenging to navigate through the some parts of the interface due to lack of hierarchy in information, leading to difficulties in locating specific information or features.
  • There is no clear indication of when the data was updated last.
  • The abundance of graphs overwhelms with data, especially when viewing multiple graphs simultaneously, making it easy to lose context.

Proposed Design Solution

Production Overview is divided into three parts: Overview, Analysis, and Modify.

Overview

The Overview Tab includes the Shift View, which is the default, and Day view. It also features Shift and Day Progress Bars, Important KPIs, and a JPH Graph to visualize trends. The Overall Production Visualization provides insights into shift-wise, quality-wise, and part-type-wise production.

Analysis

In Analysis, there are two main sections: overall graph and Pareto. Here, one can set a date range and analyze the data by selecting parameters to focus on and applying filters such as shift, part type, and assets. This allows users to drill down to see performance over time, ranging from a 7-day to an asset level.

Modify

In Modify, users can select a date range and adjust shift details — timings, breaks, and mark as off, along with modifying shift targets based on part types. Users can also attribute the reason for modification, and maintain a modification log, adding context behind any modification.

Information Architecture

The information architecture across the three tabs.
The architecture across all three tabs

Overview Tab

The Overview Tab includes the Shift View, which is the default, and Day view. It also features Shift and Day Progress Bars, Important KPIs, and a JPH Graph to visualize trends. The Overall Production Visualization provides insights into shift-wise, day-wise quality-wise, and part-type-wise production.

The Overview tab — shift progress, KPI stack and JPH trend.
Overview — shift progress, KPI stack, JPH trend
Overall production visualisation broken down by shift, quality and part type.
Overall production, by shift, quality and part type

Analysis Tab

Under Analysis Tab, there are two main sub-tabs: Overall and Pareto. Here, one can set a date range and analyze the data by selecting parameters to focus on and applying filters such as shift, part type, and assets. This allows users to drill down to see performance over time, ranging from a 7-day to an asset level.

The Analysis tab with date range, parameter selection and filters.
Analysis — date range, parameters, filters
The Pareto sub-tab drilling down to asset level.
Pareto — drilling down to asset level

Modify Tab

In Modify, users can select a date range and adjust shift details — timings, breaks, and mark shift as off, along with modifying shift targets based on part types. Users can also attribute the reason for modification, and maintain a modification log, adding context behind any modification.

The Modify tab with date selection and summary.
Modify — date selection and summary
Shift timing, breaks and on/off controls.
Shift timings, breaks, and marking a shift off
Part-type-wise target modification within a shift.
Part-type targets within a shift
Attributing a reason to each modification.
Every modification carries a reason
The modification log listing what changed, when, why and by whom.
The modification log — what changed, when, why, by whom

Strengths of Solution

  • Automates tedious manual data entry processes and streamlines communication chains with shared dashboards.
  • Centralizes data collection from fragmented sources into a single platform, streamlines labor-intensive data input tasks.
  • Generates actionable insights for decision-making.
  • Enables real-time root cause identification, reducing delays.
  • Facilitates the identification of persistent elements contributing to operational challenges.

Usability Testing

I crafted a screener to select ten participants meeting predefined criteria, which comprised 3+ years of manufacturing experience, specialized training, strong technical skills, advanced problem-solving, and regular interaction with manufacturing software and IIOT devices.

Participants
10
Duration
60 – 120 Mins
The session structure: introduction and purpose of study, task assignment, think-aloud protocol and observation, post-task questions and criteria evaluation, PURE evaluation, NASA-TLX assessment, concluding remarks, then analysis and recommendations.
How each session was run, start to finish

Task Assignment

Task 1 — Overview

Check Overall Production and JPH for the Current Shift & Day

As a production supervisor, you need to review the Overall Production, Good Parts and Bad Parts Production and JPH trend for the Current Shift and further review the Overall Production, Good Parts and Bad Parts Production and Average JPH for the Day. Can you locate and interpret this information in the system?

Task 2 — Analysis

Analyze JPH for Part Type A in Shift 1 for the Last 10 Days

As a production supervisor or production manager, you are interested in analyzing the Average JPH of Part Type A during Shift 1 over the past 10 days. Can you navigate to the appropriate section and retrieve this information? Can you identify the Day with lowest JPH and further interpret the major asset contributing to it?

Task 3 — Modify

Modify Shift Timing and Revise Targets for Upcoming Week

As a production supervisor or production planner, you need to adjust the timing for Shift 1, to include an additional 1 hour of runtime for next week. Further, you want to increase the production targets for Part Type A by 30 parts. Can you locate the appropriate section and make the necessary modifications?

Average Rating Analysis — Criteria Evaluation

Average rating analysis by criteria. Clarity and Presentation 4.1, 3.2, 3.7. Error Prevention 3.4, 4.0, 3.4. Navigation 4.6, 2.9, 4.0. Efficiency 3.8, 3.4, 3.9. User Satisfaction 3.9, 3.5, 3.8, across tasks one, two and three.

Scatter Diagram — Criteria Evaluation

Scatter diagram plotting each criterion's rating across the three tasks.

Strengths and Weaknesses

  • This is really quick and helps me interpret all crucial information required as a production supervisor
  • This is very cool and is a huge improvement from the existing feature
  • The visualizations are helping me quickly understand the production breakup
  • The data is all there but it takes a while to find it, I really have to work for it
  • Just tell me the issue and the solution, I don't want to interpret
  • Finding asset level data is not intuitive in the flow, which is needed to find the culprit

Rating Analysis — PURE Evaluation

PURE evaluation scoring every step of the three tasks as easy, moderate or difficult.

Rating Analysis — NASA Task Load Index (TLX)

NASA Task Load Index ratings across the three tasks. Mental 31.5, 43.0, 33.0. Physical 15.5, 32.0, 25.5. Temporal 18.5, 35.0, 32.5. Performance 23.0, 31.5, 21.5. Effort 24.0, 41.0, 29.5. Frustration 11.0, 30.5, 32.0.

Scatter Diagram — NASA Task Load Index (TLX)

Scatter diagram plotting each NASA-TLX workload dimension across the three tasks.

Key Insights and Way Forward

  • Ensure that the navigation between different sections of the application is intuitive and clearly indicated. Provide clear labels and indications of where users can find relevant information.
  • Increase the clarity of graphical representations by improving the visibility of data labels and making them available without needing to hover over data points.
  • Consider using color-coded visuals to indicate trends or changes in data.
  • Develop the insights section further to provide detailed analysis and recommendations based on user selections. This can include suggestions on which parts or shifts need further analysis and why, as well as insights on production trends and potential areas for improvement.
  • Provide clear summaries before finalizing modifications to help users make informed decisions, and allow bulk modifications. Implement detailed toast messages and modification logs to provide users with clear feedback on modifications.
  • Factor in edge cases such as overlapping time across shifts after modifications and ensure that the design accommodates these scenarios effectively. Provide clear indications of modifications made in other shifts to avoid confusion.
  • Consider integrating with ERP systems or incorporating resource allocation features to provide users with a true reference of available resources. This will help streamline planning processes and reduce the need for manual calculations.
  • Provide clear instructions and guidance throughout the application to help users navigate and understand complex features. This can include tooltips, onboarding tutorials, and contextual help options.

Heuristic Evaluation

I conducted a heuristic evaluation of a production monitoring system with four usability experts. We began by defining the evaluation objectives and selecting Nielsen's heuristics. After aggregating their findings, we held a debriefing session to discuss and prioritize the issues.

  • Visibility of System Status
  • Match Between System & the Real World
  • User Control & Freedom
  • Consistency & Standards
  • Error Prevention
  • Recognition Rather than Recall
  • Flexibility & Efficiency of Use
  • Aesthetic & Minimalist Design
  • Help Users Recognize, Diagnose & Recover from Errors
  • Help & Documentation
  • Incorporate prominent timestamps to indicate the last data update, ensuring users have latest information.
  • Offer detailed error messages that not only pinpoint issues but also provide steps for resolution.
  • Implement clear and easily identifiable emergency exits to allow users to swiftly navigate out of undesired states or functions. Consistently placing these exits and visual elements across the interface aids in intuitive navigation.
  • Enhance readability by employing larger font sizes and incorporating visual cues such as color contrast or icons to guide users' attention to important information or actions within the interface.
  • Utilize tooltips or brief explanations to clarify complex terminology, helping users understand system functionalities without confusion or ambiguity.
  • Expand user support resources: Broaden help resources with interactive tutorials and contextual tooltips, assisting users in navigating complex features or functionalities. These additional resources serve to empower users and enhance their overall experience with the system.

Revised and Improved Designs

Post evaluations and feedback rounds, I revised a few elements in the design.

Shift/Day Overview with KPI cards showing a percentage or time change against the last shift, alongside the shift production breakup and JPH timeseries graphs.
KPI comparison with equivalent time period — responds to “I don’t want to interpret”
The Analysis tab's date range, parameter and machine selectors above the Overall Production Graph.
Parameter Selection — responds to “finding asset level data is not intuitive”
The Modification Log with a shift-group tooltip open, listing shift times and breaks for the selected entry.
Modification Log
Modify Schedule step 1, Entity and Date Selection, with a date range, entity dropdown and schedule summary table.
Entity and Date Selection · Quick Access — responds to “it takes a while to find it”
Modify Schedule step 2, Shift Group, with shift start/end times and break entries for Shift 1.
Shift Group and Breaks
Modify Schedule step 3, Enter Target Counts, broken out per machine.
Machine Level Target
The same Targets step with Combine Target JPH switched on, applying one target across all 32 selected machines.
Line Level Target
Modify Schedule step 4, Reason for Modification, with a checklist of reasons such as Material Unavailable and Unplanned Maintenance.
Reasons for Modification
Confirmation popup after a successful schedule modification, showing the date range, shift group, modifier and reason.
Modification Successful Popup
Simplified calendar view showing each day's shift breakdown and Overall Good Parts total.
Simplified Calendar View
Expanded day-detail panel for a selected date, showing the full production summary, shift breakdown and KPIs.
Day-Level Production Detail

Future Scope

  • Utilize AI to provide deeper insights and recommendations based on historical data and real-time inputs. Develop advanced analytics and RCA capabilities.
  • Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to refine and assign tasks tailored to various personas while include functionalities such as operator management and performance tracking.
  • Develop mobile view for stakeholders to access and interact on-the-go.
  • Track and optimize energy consumption to contribute to sustainability goals.
  • Deepen ERP, SCM integration and expose APIs to extend the module to include production planning.